Hiring Diverse Faculty: Promising Practices
Thursday, February 2, 2017, 1:00-2:00 p.m. Eastern Time
- Hannah Valantine, M.D., Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity, National Institutes of Health
- Nancy Absersold, Founder and Executive Director, Higher Education Recruitment Consortium
- Douglas Haynes, Ph.D., Vice Provost for Academic Equity, Diversity & Inclusion and Director, UCI ADVANCE Program, University of California, Irvine
- Elebeoba May, Ph.D., Director for Biomedical Engineering Research Program and Associate Professor, University of Houston
University leaders know that a diverse faculty body is essential to excellence in research, teaching, service, and patient care. A diverse faculty contributes to a climate of inclusion on campus and promotes research on a wide variety of topics applicable to individuals from all backgrounds. Having a diverse faculty also encourages the ascension of diverse leaders to senior administrative positions. Although universities have a vested interest in diversifying their faculty, many universities struggle to achieve diversity goals – despite their best efforts. This webinar will explore evidence-based practices for faculty hiring as well as promising practices that could benefit from further testing. The webinar hosts will also share information about an upcoming project to pilot these promising practices, with the goal of improving evidence for strategies that work.
Addressing Unconscious Bias in Higher Education
Friday, January 13, 2017, 12:00-1:00 p.m. Eastern Time
- Laura Castillo-Page, Ph.D., Acting Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer and Senior Director, Diversity Policies and Programs, Association of American Medical Colleges
- Brian Gibbs, Ph.D., MPA, Vice President, Equity & Inclusion, Oregon Health and Science University
- Janetta Lun, Ph.D., Senior Behavioral Scientist, National Institutes of Health
- Janice Sabin, Ph.D., MSW, Research Associate Professor, University of Washington Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, and Affiliated Faculty, University of Washington School of Medicine Center for Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
Providing unconscious bias training to faculty and staff may reduce discrimination and the impact of bias at the university. Although evidence-based training models exist, effective implementation of those models is critical. Some universities have found that mandatory training can incite backlash, while voluntary training is unlikely to reach those who need it most. In addition, not all biases can be addressed at once; separate trainings are needed for racial bias, gender bias, disability bias, etc. During this webinar, experts on unconscious bias training will share evidence from their research, describe effective models, and discuss challenges for implementation. The speakers will also discuss remaining research gaps that limit the applicability of unconscious bias interventions across different contexts (e.g., admissions) and next steps for expanding the use of this promising practice.
Webinar: Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions - What We Need to Know
November 3, 2016,12:00-1:00 p.m. ET
- Courtney Ferrell Aklin, Ph.D., Chief of Staff, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Julia Kent, Ph.D., Assistant Vice President for Communications, Advancement and Best Practices at the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS)
- Ambika Mathur, Ph.D., Associate Provost for Scientific Workforce Training, Development and Diversity, and Dean of the Graduate School at Wayne State University
- Keivan G. Stassun, Ph.D., Stevenson Endowed Professor of Physics & Astronomy and Senior Associate Dean for Graduate Education and Research at Vanderbilt University
The pathway to becoming a scientist leads through graduate school, and graduate admissions committees are the gatekeepers. How they choose to evaluate applicants to their programs impacts the development of the future research workforce. Holistic review is a university admissions strategy that assesses an applicant’s unique experiences alongside traditional measures of academic achievement such as grades and test scores. Robust evidence supports the use of holistic review in undergraduate admissions and in the health professions, but the extent to which graduate programs are using the practice – and how they are using it – is less well-known.
This webinar, co-hosted by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS), the Coalition of Urban Serving Universities (USU), and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU), is part of a series intended to stimulate discussion and engage university leaders around topics from the recent report Increasing Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce: Actions for Improving Evidence, supported by the NIH. The webinar will explore existing evidence for the promising practice of holistic review and critical gaps in evidence that need to be addressed. Speakers will discuss the challenges associated with holistic review in graduate admissions, with a particular focus on STEM and the biomedical sciences where scholars from diverse backgrounds are underrepresented. The webinar will close with information about a proposed action item to pilot holistic review in STEM and biomedical science graduate programs.
Virtual Release: Improving Diversity and Institutional Climate through Faculty Cluster Hiring
April 30, 2015, 2:30 - 3:30 p.m. EDT
- Michael V. Drake, Ph.D., President, The Ohio State University
- Randy Woodson, Ph.D., Chancellor, North Carolina State University
- Susan D. Phillips, Ph.D., Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, SUNY Downstate, and Vice President for Strategic Partnerships, University at Albany, SUNY
- Marc Nivet, Ed.D., MBA, Chief Diversity Officer, Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
Many universities pursue interdisciplinary research and collaboration as strategies for addressing grand challenges facing our society. University leaders also recognize the value of diversity in higher education, as scholars from diverse backgrounds inject new perspectives into teaching, research, and service and help universities advance their missions. An inclusive campus climate that values diversity is one of the determinants of institutional excellence, and leaders seek strategies to improve the climate at their institutions. Faculty diversity and an inclusive climate are especially important in the health professions, as graduates must have the background, qualities, and skills to serve diverse patient populations and reduce health disparities.
In this live webcast, Urban Universities for HEALTH will formally release the results from a qualitative study of faculty cluster hiring, an emerging practice in higher education that involves hiring faculty into multiple departments or colleges around interdisciplinary research topics, or “clusters.” Many cluster hiring programs also aim to increase faculty diversity or address other aspects of intellectual life at the institution, including faculty career success, collaboration across disciplines, the teaching and learning environment, and community engagement.
The report, developed by an advisory group of provosts and other faculty hiring experts at APLU/USU institutions, draws upon the experiences of 10 public universities that have developed faculty cluster hiring programs. The report will share promising practices university leaders may consider as they seek to improve diversity and climate on their campuses.
Join the conversation on Twitter at #clusterhiring.
Press Release: National Study on University Admissions in the Health Professions
Tuesday, September 30, 2014,9:00-10:00 a.m. EDT
- Greer Glazer, Co-Principal Investigator, Associate Vice President for Health Affairs and Dean, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati
- Darrell G. Kirch, President and CEO, Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
- Yvonne Maddox, Acting Director, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Neil D. Theobald, President, Temple University
- M. Roy Wilson, President, Wayne State University
On September 30, 2014, in Washington, DC, the Urban Universities for HEALTH Learning Collaborative will release a report that is the first to examine nationwide the impact and use of holistic review—a university admissions process that assesses an applicant’s unique experiences alongside traditional measures of academic achievement such as grades and test scores—for students pursuing careers in the health professions.
Many colleges and universities use a holistic admission process to select students. The practice has become more popular in health fields such as medicine, because it enables schools to evaluate a broader range of criteria important for student success, and to select individuals with the background and skills needed to meet the demands of a transforming health care environment. However, the extent to which this admissions practice was being used across multiple health professions schools nationwide and the impact it’s had on academic success, diversity, and other outcomes—such as students’ engagement with the community—were largely unknown until now.
The National Study on University Admissions in the Health Professions was conducted jointly by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU), and the Coalition of Urban Serving Universities (USU), and funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
At the event, researchers and higher education leaders will discuss key findings from the study and the impact of the holistic review process.
Join the conversation on Twitter at #HolisticReview.